On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 18:30 +0000, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Patrick O'Callaghan <pocallaghan <at> gmail.com> writes: > > Well, naturally it's up to me, but I was hoping for some insight into > > the relationship between the various repos. I started using kde-redhat a > > few weeks back in order to get a preview of KDE 4.1, and it has gone > > pretty well all in all. What I'd like to know is if there'll be some > > kind of transition period (as happens between Rawhide and the next > > Fedora release) during which changes to kde-redhat are frozen and people > > decide whether to continue on the bleeding edge or return to the > > "official" updates. I don't know if I'm making myself clear here, but > > what I want to avoid is a situation where I block kde-redhat and > > suddenly find a lot of broken dependencies. > > Normally, the packages in the official updates will have newer EVRs > (Epoch-Version-Releases, i.e. what defines RPM's version ordering) than what's > currently in kde-redhat testing. Only some packages which stayed in kde-redhat > unstable will not be included in the official updates: cmake 2.6, kdepim 4.1, > and the alpha versions Amarok 2 and KOffice 2. I expect these to stay in > kde-redhat unstable. So you should not run into broken dependencies. OK, sounds good. However since I don't really want updates-testing for everything else (i.e. non KDE stuff) I may just wait till it goes to updates. poc -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
