On Jul 21, 2008, Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> The GPL meets both the FS and the OSS definition. > News to me. http://www.opensource.org/node/193 > GPLv3 has clauses which are specifically aimed at certain uses I guess it's pointless for me to ask you to substantiate this, since you're probably back to the silliness of kill-filing me. But if you read this, please do. > OSS no. Something I imagine RMS is not too worried about ? Why stop at the speculation? Go ahead, ask him, then let us know. -- Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Free Software Evangelist oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} FSFLA Board Member ¡Sé Libre! => http://www.fsfla.org/ Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org} -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
