On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Antonio Olivares <olivares14031@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> You're still talking as if your opponents want to name >> entire >> distributions "GNU/Linux". I'm not so sure >> that there really is anyone who >> wants to name entire distributions "GNU/Linux". >> Are you sure that there are >> people who want to do this? Do you have any evidence? > > They do, take a look here > http://www.getgnulinux.org/ > if you click on more, see what you find > http://www.getgnulinux.org/more/ > > http://www.gnulinuxmatters.org/about/ > > The wikipedia tries to explain which ones are truly GNU/Linux > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_distribution > > There is an article to the 7 most influential GNU/Linux Distributions > > http://itmanagement.earthweb.com/entdev/article.php/3701421 > > Like I have said before, it should not matter but there are many people that do take offense, if you say Linux only, they want to exert their muscle and say GNU/Linux is the appropriate name. There are no correct answers here :) > yes there are. Linux is not an operating system. That is a fact. It is common for people to refer to an OS as Linux but it is not factually correct. -- If opinions were really like assholes we'd each have just one -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
