Björn Persson wrote:
You're still talking as if your opponents want to name entire distributions "GNU/Linux". I'm not so sure that there really is anyone who wants to name entire distributions "GNU/Linux". Are you sure that there are people who want to do this? Do you have any evidence?
I don't have much occasion to talk about a subset that is more than a kernel and less than a distribution with real applications so I'm not sure where or why such a name would be used. I asked about that before but didn't get any compelling answers. While I understand roughly the scope of what GNU/Linux would encompass, there's really no such specific distribution that I know of, and there wouldn't be much reason to use it on its own unless you just like to live in emacs.
-- Les Mikesell lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
