On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 11:07 -0400, Jeffrey Ross wrote:
>
> Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 21:09:02 -0700,
> > Jonathan Ryshpan <jonrysh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> Will this also fix a similar update problem on x86_64 systems? An
> >> extract from a yum log follows. The update process is bringing in
> >> xulrunner-1.9-0.60.beta5.fc9.i386.rpm
> >> (why?) even though a more recent version
> >> xulrunner-1.9.0.1-1.fc9.i386.rpm
> >> exists on at least some repositories. A complete log of the update is
> >> attached.
> >
> > I am still seeing that problem as of this morning. It looks like the updated
> > rpm is in the repo, but the metadata for x86_64 doesn't refer to it.
> >
> Is there any way to work around the update problem with
> xulrunner-1.9-0.beta5?? As of a few minutes ago I'm still hitting
> against this dependency problem.
I haven't found one. I tried downloading
xulrunner-1.9.0.1-1.fc9.i386.rpm
and installing it using
rpm --install --nodeps xulrunner-1.9.0.1-1.fc9.i386.rpm
only to find further difficulties when upgrading the rest of the system
using yum. Unfortunately I didn't keep a record of what the
difficulties were.
jon
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
