Re: Why is Fedora not a Free GNU/Linux distributions?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



John Burton wrote:

The side effect of the unneeded restriction of $90k dollars for a Mercedes is that I don't get to drive one. Cry me a river. Cooperation is the cost of reusing GPL licensed software.

Close your eyes for a moment and picture a big red tag that reads:

    $ COOPERATION

That's the GPL.

Okay, here are a couple of questions I haven't seen answered. There are several "license" schemes put forth for Open Source software. GPL and BSD are two that come to mind immediately. The purpose of "open source" is to counter the traditional closed source model of software. o Which OSS license scheme does the best job of promoting "cooperation" and reuse of the software? why?

This has been debated endlessly, but if you look at the historical examples I think you have to conclude that the evolution and reuse of code is an organic process and not very predictable - and that much of the best currently available open source code has gone through versions that were non-open for some periods of time. Using the GPL prohibits that potential step in development where commercial funding might be contributing to subsequently available code - as well as any improvements that might come from components under different licenses or developers who refuse to encumber their work with the GPL restrictions.

o Programmers live in the real world. They have to do mundane things like pay rent/mortgages, pay bills (heat, gas, internet connection, etc). Which OSS license scheme does the best job of supporting the programmer ? (if the programmer has to spend 1/2 their time fund-raising to support their programming, then is it worthwhile?) Why?

You need to propose a business model before that question can be answered in the context of open source. If you are talking about selling/supporting a product while releasing the code, the GPL restrictions that limit the ways the code can be improved work to your advantage and if you own the copyright to the entire code base you can offer a different commercial license for some uses. But, if you go out of business, the released GPL'd code is still stuck with the restrictions that limit the ways it can be re-used.

--
  Les Mikesell
   lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux