Patrick O'Callaghan <pocallaghan <at> gmail.com> writes: > The fact that there's no visible license makes me think it's not Open > Source or Free within the accepted guidelines, just that they provide > source code. The source files have clear GPLv2+ license headers. It's just the copy of the GPL which is missing. Kevin Kofler -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list