Re: FC 8 & 9: instable file system

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



For the records, I've entered a bug report:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454848




----- Original Message ----
From: Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve <rwgk@xxxxxxxxx>
To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, July 9, 2008 10:04:43 PM
Subject: Re: FC 8 & 9: instable file system

It turns out the problem described below is connected to the kernel version.
Today, I ran "yum update" on the "other Fedora 8" machine mentioned below.
After rebooting with the new kernel (2.6.25.9-40.fc8) I'm seeing the application
failures due to intermittently missing files.
After rebooting with the old kernel (2.6.23.15-137.fc8) the machine is
completely stable again.
I'd say it is pretty clear there is a bug in the newer kernels.

For the records, the first kernel version I know is broken is 2.6.25.4-10.fc8.



----- Original Message ----
From: Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve <rwgk@xxxxxxxxx>
To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, July 9, 2008 11:01:38 AM
Subject: FC 8 & 9: instable file system

Randomly, files appear to be missing, leading to application failures. When immediately trying again
the exact same command it (usually) works.

We see this behavior on three systems:

  Fedora 8: 2.6.25.4-10.fc8 #1 SMP Thu May 22 22:58:37 EDT 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

  Fedora 8: 2.6.25.6-27.fc8 #1 SMP Fri Jun 13 16:17:54 EDT 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

  Fedora 9: 2.6.25.9-76.fc9.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Jun 27 15:58:30 EDT 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

We have other Fedora 8 systems with older kernels that are completely stable, e.g.:

  2.6.23.15-137.fc8 #1 SMP Sun Feb 10 17:03:13 EST 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

We had intermittently missing files on both local disks (ext3) and over NFS, with mounts form various
hosts including a Netapp filer that's serving 30+ other machines without a problem.

My best way of demonstrating the problem is to repeatedly run SCons (which is a make replacement) on
a large source tree with several thousand files. This performs a full dependency analysis and should
just find that everything is already up-to-date. About 10% of the SCons runs fail with "missing" file
warnings, or spurious recompilation, presumably because header files are intermittently missing, which
changes the source signatures.

I already asked the SCons people, the hardware vendor, 3ware support, and I ran yum update a few times
in hopes that the problem goes way. So far it has been persistent.

Has anybody on this list seen similar problems?

Ralf

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux