On Sun, 06 Jul 2008 22:13:01 -0500 Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > pds wrote: > > > When features are in KDE3.5 work better than the newer version, > > I'll ask for the older version back anytime. You want specific > > examples: > > And there are a multitude of specific examples where kde4 is better. > This is certainly not constructive feedback. Sigh, if you like kde3, > fine, stick with Fedora 8. It's about choice, NOT what is better about KDE4 its more about what is MISSING! If you can't understand that some users work in a specific way or need to work in a specific way then..... There could be other reason why I want or might even need Fedora 9, but that is my choice. I would like a choice at least better KDE3.5 and KDE 4.x until 4.x has all the features of 3.5. > > > > I also think a complete previous revision should be supplied until > > the next revision is functionally equivalent. This will give USER > > the choice > > Please read the FAQ again. I would *love* to be able to provide just > that, and asked developers point-blank if this is something > possible(1) or supported. Answer was no. > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/KDE/KDE4FAQ > > (1) without horrible hacks or FHS violations. Hmmm.... The FAQ provide some information, but not exactly what I was asking. What I really read was, that there was not enough resources to provide both KDE3.5 and KDE4.0 with ONLY one installed at a time. I didn't ask to have both kde4 & kde3 installed at the same time. Yes, there will always be ways to shoot yourself in the foot. I'll consider this dead since there was a conscious decision to force this issue. I'll look at other distros or methods or means to obtain the features I need. so long... > > -- Rex > -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
