On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 12:03 -0400, max wrote: > Parshwa Murdia wrote: > > hi, > > when i asked for the keylogger in my system, why people thought of illegal > > activities only? it is MINE system and for use only in my system, i am > > asking and further more, like one must have knowledge of viruses and then > > only he can create an antivirus, similarly it is for the knowledge of > > keylogger to prevent the thefts > > parshwa > > > > > If you want to know how to find keyloggers then you might want to look > at how programs like chkrootkit and rkhunter function. As for installing > one, well you'd go about that just like you would any other program. > There is nothing special about a virus or keylogger, they are programs > just like open office or vi. That is why anti-virus programs rely > heavily on updates, it is very difficult to tell one program from > another, if there was some magic flag that went up when a program was > malicious there wouldn't be a virus problem. They use heuristics as well > to try and determine if a program is malicious but programs flagged by > heuristics are just as likely to be benign as malicious. The best > solution is to strictly control what is allowed to execute on the > system. How many programs do you really use on a regular basis? > > -- > Fortune favors the BOLD > I wouldn't say that programs marked by heuristics are just as likely to be good. The quality of the heuristics continually improve, and are much better than that. Typically heuristics are applied to programs and program errors that remain after other methods have considerably narrowed the list. I suspect that their accuracy greatly exceeds 95% these days due to the order of application, and that is improved even more by some background software applied after the heuristic ID. Please don't overstate the case. It is hard enough to get people to run antivirus now. REgards, Les H -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
