Re: BOINC again !? -- I give up.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2008-06-29 at 06:48 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> Craig White wrote:
> > On Sat, 2008-06-28 at 16:19 -0400, William Case wrote:
> > 
> >> If it can't I will try Patrick's Network Manager solution.
> >>
> >> If that works, I then have to decide whether this is a Network Manager
> >> bug; a Boinc bug; or both.  Of course, if boincmgr does successfully
> >> reconnect to WCG and download additional work units, I will write the
> >> whole thing off as my screwing around too much while Boinc was just
> >> trying to do its thing.
> > ----
> > service boinc restart
> > 
> > a relatively simple fix.
> > 
> > If you were to file a bug report, I would file it against NetworkManager
> > as this would mean that boinc works when networking is fully functional.
> 
> If the analysis of NM starting too late in the boot process is correct, 
> wouldn't one of these make life a bit more tolerable?  Keeping in mind that 
> I don't use F9, NM, or BOINC.  :-)
> 
> 1.   Change the script number in /etc/init.d of NM to a lower number than 
> BOINC or change BOINC number to one higher than NM.
> 
> 2.    Do not configure BOINC to start a boot time in the usual manner but 
> add a "server boinc start" to rc.local.
----
I too don't use NM or BOINC but I do use F9

On F8, this clearly was a problem...
# grep chkconfig /etc/init.d/NetworkManager
# chkconfig: - 98 02

but on F9, I would have thought that this would have solved some of
these issues...
# grep chkconfig /etc/init.d/NetworkManager
# chkconfig: - 27 84

which would have it start up much earlier (of course if this was an
upgrade instead of clean install, I don't know if the sequences are
adjusted when the upgrade is accomplished). I don't have BOINC installed
but I have to believe that the startup sequence number would already
have it loading after NM.

I would think that moving it up from 98 to 27 would have solved many of
the reported issues but perhaps not...I just don't know and as you say,
I don't personally use NM.

My own personal preference would be to leave NM enabled at boot time and
put '/sbin/server boinc restart' in rc.local only because sometimes I
look at boot time services and would want to know that the 'intent' was
to start it up.

Craig

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux