Re: What is the matter with fedora 9?

["Mikkel L. Ellertson" <mikkel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Stephen Berg (Contractor) wrote:
> Bill Davidsen wrote:
> After about a dozen installs of Fedora 9 I cannot agree with you on 
> that.  On every system save one there is only one network connection, in 
> each of those cases it's been /dev/eth0 and NM would not enable the 
> connection by default.
> Maybe there's documentation on the way that will make NM a breeze to 
> configure but until that time it's out the window.  I disable the 
> NetworkManager service and enable the network service during kickstart 
> installs.  All my systems have a statically leased DHCP address and it 
> works just fine.
> Bottom line for me:  NM breaks far more than it fixes.
One problem for a lot of people is that NM does not open the network 
connection until the user logs in. This is a problem for anything 
that needs a network connection before you log in.

Mikkel
--

  Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons,
for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list