On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 12:11:20 -0400, Mark Haney wrote: > Michael Schwendt wrote: > > On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:50:26 -0400, Mark Haney wrote: > > > >> Here's what I see. It all points to F9 repos: > >> > >> [root@sulla yum.repos.d]# yum repolist > >> Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit > >> repo id repo name status > >> InstallMedia Fedora 8 enabled > >> adobe-linux-i386 Adobe Systems Incorporated enabled > >> fedora Fedora 9 - i386 enabled > >> updates Fedora 9 - i386 - Updates enabled > >> > >> Except the InstallMedia one. Could that be the problem? > > > > Careful here. That explains nothing. $basearch in your *.repo files > > is also in the "repo name" field, but the repo baseurl could be > > hardcoded to point to Fedora 8 updates. Do check your *.repo files > > at a lower level, _not_ with yum repolist. > > > > Well, I did take a look at them manually and they /look/ okay. I just > can't tell for certain is $releasever is being inserted as '8' instead > of '9' somehow. Unlikely, because above in "yum repolist" $releasever is 9 for two repo names. Unless everything is hardcoded ;-) and the InstallMedia repo is based on $releasever=8. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
