On Sat, 2008-06-21 at 10:48 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote: > On Friday 20 June 2008 23:53:47 Marcelo Magno T. Sales wrote: > > I saw no one stating nothing like that. The blame some people have put > > on Fedora was for shipping an incomplete KDE4 when there was the option > > to ship the fully functional KDE 3.5.9. These people said that Fedora > > should have waited for KDE4 to become more stable/functional before > > opting to include it in Fedora. > > That's all, and even that is arguable. > > Most of the really bad things about KDE4 were fixed about a week after release > of F9. I consider that pretty good. OK, the desktop can't, at present, be > used in just the same way as we have done before, but everything is > available, so is it really such a big deal? We have been told that even that > is fixed in 4.1, which is only a few weeks away. > > My first reaction to finding that I didn't have desktop icons for my nfs > shares was a feeling of loss, yet I can open those shares in either dolphin > or konqueror, so it's really no more than a minor inconvenience. The same > goes for most of the other things that are 'missing'. Work-arounds exist, > while work goes on to fix the situation. ---- FWIW...I found that this behavior stopped when I went to autofs mounting anyway so it's no loss. Craig -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
