On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Paul Johnson <pauljohn32@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 9:49 AM, Timothy Murphy <gayleard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Mike Bird wrote: >> >>> My loyalty is to keeping my systems secure and my users productive. >>> It's hard to believe that Red Hat would ship KDE 4.1 in F10, but if >>> it does KDE users will just choose another distro and install it. >> >> Speak for yourself. >> I doubt if you speak for anyone else. >> You certainly don't speak for this KDE user. >> >> -- > > He is speaking for me. I was a RedHat / Fedora user 10 years, 1 month > ago, I became an Ubuntu user. That's cool, but surely you didn't do it for more KDE? > Being a beta tester for RedHat is OK as a way of life, but the other > companies for which I test stuff give me free samples :) I guess if you repeat this "beta tester for RedHat" you will eventually believe it. > It never came clear to me until I read Ann Wilson's post in this > thread: "We should always remember that Fedora > does not set out to be the stable desktop required in most production > situations. You use it at your peril, The fact that it actually > works in most situations is a bonus." This isn't some deep secret > It never really struck me that way: if you use Fedora, you don't have > a reason to expect that your PC will actually work. Well, I do need > it to start up sometimes so I can read this group. That's an exaggeration. You have an expectation that your PC will work, you just don't have an expectation of having stable software all the time. -- Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine ( www.pembo13.com ) -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
