On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 3:12 AM, Andrew Kelly <akelly@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 12:17 -0500, Arthur Pemberton wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 4:07 AM, Andrew Kelly <akelly@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >> > On Sat, 2008-06-14 at 15:03 -0600, linuxguy wrote: >> >> On Sat, 2008-06-14 at 09:38 -0700, Mike Bird wrote: >> >> > QUESTION TO DEVELOPERS: Is there any hope of a full KDE 3.5 >> >> > in F10, plus an upgrade path from F8 to F10 that preserves >> >> > KDE 3.5 configurations? >> >> > >> >> > KDE 4.0 is incomplete and not suitable for most users. >> >> >> >> >> >> I totally agree ! I was going to post about this but I didn't want to >> >> upset the group. But its true ! F9 is the WORST RH/Fedora release I >> >> have ever used and I've been doing this since RH8. >> >> >> >> I want KDE 3.5 back for F10. >> >> >> >> And don't give me the crap that Fedora is bleeding edge software. F9 >> >> is beyond bleeding, its suicidal. >> >> >> > >> > F10 will be out before you know it, and F8 still gets dozens of updates >> > a week. I still can't get that to sit well with me. Are things being >> > accelerated to the point of there being 5 Fedora releases for each RHEL >> > release? Or is EL re-tooling for annual releases, maybe? >> > >> > Andy >> >> Has anything change? Doesn't Fedora still follow it's original 6 month >> release cycle? > > Yeah, guess you're right, Arthur. Sure feels quicker to me lately, > though. Don't know why. > Mebbe it's just my brain slowing down. According to the last announcement made about the releases (public announcement) A month (or a few weeks) were skipped to get back on track with schedule. I can't remember the details. So last release cycle was likely less than exactly 6 months. > When is RHEL 6 supposed to release? I don't know. -- Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine ( www.pembo13.com ) -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
