On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 14:42 -0400, Raymond C. Rodgers wrote: > Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 14:08 -0700, stan wrote: > > > >> Brian C. Huffman wrote: > >> > >>> I don't know for sure, but I think this must have been fixed by rc2 (based on my current performance). I couldn't live with the IO thrashing in b5. > >>> > >>> I just downloaded the binary from mozilla.org and installed it under /usr/lib/firefox-3.0rc2 and changed the references in /usr/bin/firefox. My performance is *much* better now. > >>> > >>> Once they get an RPM out, I'll switch. But for now, I'm able to actually work. > >>> > >>> -b > >>> > >> Thanks for letting me know that RC2 is fixed for this issue, sounds like > >> the way to go. > >> You're right about how inconvenient it is. :-) > >> > > > > I dl´ed the RC3 binary from mozilla.com and it does seem to work better. > > Unfortunately it's a 32-bit binary so a lot of my plugins don't work. I > > can't seem to find a 64-bit version anywhere. I seem to remember Mozilla > > used to keep a larger set of binaries in ftp.mozilla.com, not all of > > which appeared on the Web page, but now it's gone. > > > > Anyone managed to obtain (or build) a 64-bit version of RC3? > > > > poc > > > > PS I don't understand why this isn't considered important enough to be > > put in the updates repo. > > > > > Not I but Mozilla has announced that Firefox 3 will be officially > released on June 17th, so I imagine the Fedora 9 update won't be far behind. Yes, just saw that. Fingers crossed. poc -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
