On Sat, 2008-06-07 at 08:19 +0200, Antonio M wrote: > 2008/6/7 Jonathan Ryshpan <jonrysh@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > > On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 07:10 +0200, Antonio M wrote: > >> will you check the dimension of ./mozilla/pluginreg.dat against > >> ./mozilla/firefox/xxxxxx.default/pluginred.dat ??? > >> > >> See Bug 448895: Firefox plugins are not working > > > > $ cd $HOME > > $ find .mozilla -name pluginreg.dat -ls > > 1884724 8 -rw------- 1 jonrysh jonrysh 65 Jun 5 08:24 .mozilla/firefox/zzj6jd8o.Test\ Printer/pluginreg.dat > > 1884717 12 -rw------- 1 jonrysh jonrysh 5758 Jun 1 07:40 .mozilla/firefox/pluginreg.dat > > > > As you see, the files are not the same size. > > > > Can you tell me more about what's going on. The bug you referenced, > > Redhat's "Bugzilla Bug 448895: Firefox plugins are not working" > > doesn't have anything in it about these files. > 1) please check if same files are different for another user on same > computer (and check if about:plugins says...) > 2) if you have any access to another Fedora computer, please check same files > > I solved the problem reinstalling same from another computer that same > plugins installed. Are you using nspluginwrapper? If so, the version distributed in F9 has a problem: the setup program, mozilla-plugin-config, sets up the wrapped plugins in such a way that Firefox fails to find any plugins at all. I have fixed this by removing nspluginwrapper.rpm (using yum), and then downloading and installing the plugin and viewer RPMs from the developer's site: http://gwenole.beauchesne.info/projects/nspluginwrapper/ I haven't been able to find out exactly what mozilla-plugin-config does that bothers Firefox so much, or why Firefox fails to report its trouble with bad plugins. If you can find out any more, please report it to the appropriate bugzillas; I'm unwilling to report a bug as (basically) "something is broken". All the best - jon Good Luck - jon -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
