On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 15:32 +0100, Bill Crawford wrote: > 2008/6/3 Simon Slater <pyevet@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > > > I have run the script but the results may be a little unexpected. > > Following are messages from the script. None are as a result of > > requesting web pages from the laptop, which still has the message that > > the proxy server is refusing requests and wireshark shows the same > > patterns. These logged packets are when Evolution is fetching the > > email. > > Sounds like the reset is originating from outside your network, or > there's a problem with the address ... is the IP address of the laptop > definitely routable, or being NAT'd? You might just find that you're > trying to route packets out onto the internet from addresses with the > other end of your link doesn't accept packets for coming the other > way, and is thus rejecting the packets. Or, the reset might be a > side-effect of your provider running a "no servers" policy, ... > G'day Bill, as I mentioned to François, this same hardware setup worked fine only a few weeks ago, so any "no server" policy shouldn't have any effect. The trouble only started when I went to upgrade a new install of F8 and found I couldn't connect. The laptop IP address is 192.168.0.6 and can be pinged and browsed from elsewhere on the LAN and resolves to its hostname "Acer". About being NAT'd, after running François script: [root@ipex ~]# iptables -t nat -L Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination Chain POSTROUTING (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination MASQUERADE all -- 192.168.0.0/24 anywhere Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination [root@ipex ~]# which seems fine, but: [root@ipex ~]# netstat -M netstat: no support for `ip_masquerade' on this system. [root@ipex ~]# Does this mean something is wrong with NAT? -- Regards, Simon -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
