On Thursday 29 May 2008 02:08, Tim wrote: > On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 17:49 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote: > > It is important, though, to maintain the web-of-trust. It does have > > legal implications, and that's why local signing is an option. I use > > encryption for correspondence with one person, and for that I have to > > use ultimate trust, yet I've never met him. > > I don't recall being required to "ultimately trust" someone to send them > encrypted mail. I'd call that a foolhardy thing, too. It'd be better > to set your mailer to trust people on your keyring - that affects what > you do with the keys, rather than inappropriately bodging the keys, > themselves. > Since it is a local setting it has no security implications for anyone else. Local signing is designed to cope with situations like this. Anne -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
