Anne Wilson wrote: > On Tuesday 27 May 2008 16:09:23 Rex Dieter wrote: >> > I only mention this because, despite the fact that it continues to >> > persist in F8, with it being originally filed as arising in F7 the >> > bug's set to be "officially" closed on June 13. >> >> Closed only because no one bothered to confirm whether the bug still >> exists yet or not. >> > It must be very depressing to see the huge number of bugs that stick on a > NEEDINFO ticket for years, with no-one bothering to follow them up. Shrug, folks are busy, I think we can all understand that. In a perfect world all bugs would be fixed, and everyone would get a magical fedora-branded pony. :) My take as packager, is that if a bug isn't important enough for followup (esp after NEEDINFO) or to be reported (properly), then it's not important enough to take the time/effort to look at and fix. I try to focus on the stuff that folks care about the most, where I see/hear the most (hopefully) constructive feedback. hrm... I feel a blog coming on... -- Rex -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
