I was somewhat bothered by the lack of themes, configurability and documenttation of the new gdm version. I even recompiled gdm 2.20 from the Fedora 8 source rpm, that seems to work. So if you are really bothered with the state of thee current gdm version, you can try that. David On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 09:40:14PM -0400, David Boles wrote: > g wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-05-26 at 20:46 -0400, David Boles wrote: > >> Brian C. Huffman wrote: > >>> So basically we're stuck with a substandard gdm/login for now that > >>> doesn't match other themes like screensaver w/ system theme. > >>> > >>> Nice. > >> No. You have a 'work in progress' login application. > >> > >> If this really, really upsets you may I say that perhaps *before you* > >> installed/upgraded to Fedora 9 you should have done just a little research first? > > > > considering how new f9 is and all, i would say he is still > > getting more than his money's worth. if login theme is only > > complaint, he 'bought a bargain. > > > > why bother with or worry about gdm or kdm when you can 'init 3'. > > then have each user shelled into a desktop. > > > > cheers. > > > ;-) > > Ya mean that he paid a fair price for what he has??? > > > -- > > > David > > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: signature.asc > Type: application/pgp-signature > Size: 195 bytes > Desc: OpenPGP digital signature > Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20080526/aac62a33/signature.bin > -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
