On Fri, 2008-05-23 at 11:21 -0700, Craig White wrote: > On Fri, 2008-05-23 at 13:22 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-05-23 at 12:18 -0400, Kevin J. Cummings wrote: > > > Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > > Not an answer to your question, rather a follow-up: mplayerplug-in > > > > appears not to exist for Fedora 9, at least not in the usual repos. I've > > > > been unable to view trailers at apple.com since installing F9. > > > > > > Have you tried gecko-mediaplayer? > > > > Yes. > > > > To be frank, I suspect that my real problem is I have *too many* plugins > > and they're probably clashing with each other (even though some are > > currently disabled). This is basically a result of a lack of clear > > guidelines as to what is a recommended setup, plus that fact that so > > many of the various tools (xine, mplayer, vlc etc.) have overlapping > > funcionality. Sometimes freedom of choice is a pain in the neck :-) > > > > I can't express how deeply I don't care about which video player I use. > > If I can get one of them to do everything reliably, I'll stick to it and > > dump the rest, but I suspect that isn't possible. > > > > I'm happy to be proved wrong ... > ---- > I believe that gecko-mediaplayer is the replacement (on Livna at least) > for mplayerplug-in. I'm trying it now (basically by turning off everything that doesn't say gecko-mediaplayer in the about:plugins page), but the trailers pages say "Get the Latest QuickTime". as Andre already noted. > Also with mplayer from livna...something not fixed...you must comment > out the line in /etc/mplayer/mplayer.conf... > > #flip-hebrew = no > otherwise, it won't run I knew that, but thanks. poc PS Don't know if this is relevant, but how does gecko-mediaplayer interact with nspluginwrapper? Should one have both (as I do) or pick one over the other? There is no hint in what's amusingly called the "documentation". -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
