On Mon, 19 May 2008 12:19:48 +0100 (BST), Patrick Dupre wrote: > On Mon, 19 May 2008, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > On Mon, 19 May 2008 11:43:07 +0100 (BST), Patrick Dupre wrote: > > > >> Hello, > >> > >> trying to install pine on a FC7 machine, this is the error that I got: > >> yum install pine > >> Setting up Install Process > >> Parsing package install arguments > >> Resolving Dependencies > >> --> Running transaction check > >> ---> Package pine.i386 0:4.64-7.lvn7 set to be updated > >> --> Processing Dependency: libc-client.so.2006 for package: pine > >> --> Processing Dependency: libc-client2006 >= 2006k for package: pine > >> --> Running transaction check > >> ---> Package pine.i386 0:4.64-7.lvn7 set to be updated > >> --> Processing Dependency: libc-client2006 >= 2006k for package: pine > >> ---> Package libc-client2006.i386 0:2006h-1.fc7 set to be updated > >> --> Finished Dependency Resolution > >> Error: Missing Dependency: libc-client2006 >= 2006k is needed by package > >> pine > > > > Do you see > > > > libc-client-2007a1-3.fc7 > yes, > > Installed Packages > libc-client.i386 2007a1-3.fc7 installed > > > > > in the updates repo yet? "yum list libc-client\*" > > > > $ rpm -qp --obsoletes libc-client-2007a1-3.fc7.i386.rpm > > libc-client2004d < 1:2004d-2 > > libc-client2004e < 2004e-2 > > libc-client2004g < 2004g-7 > > libc-client2006 < 2006k-2 > > libc-client2007 < 2007-2 Then there are packaging mistakes involved that cause dependency hell. The newer libc-client2007 is binary-incompatible with libc-client2006, because it provides a different library (libc-client.so.2007 versus libc-client.so.2006), and additionally, "libc-client2006" is not provided as a virtual package name although it is made obsolete. In either case, pine from Livna would need a rebuild to escape from this mess. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
