Re: FC9 - sounds of silence

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Anne Wilson wrote:
On Saturday 17 May 2008 13:51, Bill Davidsen wrote:
I did an upgrade from FC9beta to the release version, and everything
worked fine until I tried to play a clip from CNN. Then I tried youtube,
mlb.com, no sound anywhere, even though sound had been working. Appears
that pulseaudio has decided to take over sound and not let me use it.

Did you check that you had libflashsupport installed?

Finally backed up and did and install from cold, sound worked, did the
updates from the fedora and updates repositories, sound worked but no
flash, added flash from the adobe site, clips play as silent movies.

Looked for the pulseaudio docs, and decided people haven't improved them
since FC6, no hint of what to change, tons of other "no sound" posts on
various places.

Many other problems, reinstalled FC8, all working again. And I briefly
had ubuntu on the machine and that worked, so the issues seem to be with
the FC9 release, no just Linux on this hardware.

My feeling is that if I wanted an OS which insisted on doing things the
way the developer wanted, with docs which didn't cover the basics and
had only examples of the most complex cases rather than the things 90%
of users would want, I would be running Windows.

Well you gave F9 plenty of time to prove itself, didn't you?<sarcasm off>

Ran the alpha, ran the beta, both worked. The release doesn't, if libflashsupport is needed I would expect the RPM to note that in the dependencies on install. I did not have to do a library manual install with alpha or beta versions.

As for pulseaudio, documentation *says* it needs work, and has needed work since FC6. Code is fun, documentation isn't. Moreover it worked until I played the CNN clip, so it broke without an error message. pulseausio should not be the default, it should be installed if you want to play games or do whatever tricky stuff it supports, and leave alsa in and working for simple-minded folk who just want one stream from one source to work using one (alsamixer) control, not some complex and semi-documented application which results in answers like "did you diddle the hidden sliders?" Why is hiding required control a good thing in the first place?

And yes, I think that having spent two weeks on the alpha and beta, I have given FC9 a chance to prove itself, and it has. Unfortunately proved itself worse than the beta...

--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
  "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked."  - from Slashdot

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux