On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 7:30 PM, Andre Robatino (arobatino) <no-reply-gw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Valent Turkovic wrote: > > http://linuxtracker.org/index.php?page=torrent-details&id=2dc9caedfe087535556227a156e493815749f2c8 [1] > > > > > Is this source reliable? Is this same as Fedora 9 that is planed to be > > released on 13th of May? > The corresponding SHA1SUM file has been available from a number of open mirrors for a few days now and has a good signature dated May 7 from Fedora Project, so unless these ISOs get pulled from all the mirrors and replaced by tomorrow (unlikely since it takes a few days for the mirrors to sync), yes it is. On the other hand, there are good reasons other than authenticity for waiting until release day to install - to make sure the update repos are available in case serious bugs are waiting to be fixed, and also availability of the 3rd-party repos. Livna and Freshrpms don't have *-release packages for F9 yet, and it's not clear whether Rpmfusion will be available on release day to replace either or both of them. > > > Links: > ------ > [1] http://linuxtracker.org/index.php?page=torrent-details&id=2dc9caedfe087535556227a156e493815749f2c8 http://thepiratebay.org/tor/4185181 Here are also the Live CDs... So if SHA1 sums are correct I'll go and get them started before the initial rush :) Valent. -- http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com/ linux, blog, anime, spirituality, windsurf, wireless registered as user #367004 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org. ICQ: 2125241, Skype: valent.turkovic -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
