Re: Wpa_supplicant mystery

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Saturday 10 May 2008, Adalbert Prokop wrote:
Timothy Murphy wrote on Saturday 10 May 2008:

Hello!

If in fact wpa_supplicant is a necessary part of NetworkManager
even if one is not using WPA,
would it not make more sense to change its name?
NetworkManager uses wpa_supplicant to do network security this way it
doesnt
need to reinvent the wheel.  it is the same on all distros.
What is the same on all distros?
Wpa_supplicant? NetworkManager?
NetworkManager using wpa_supplicant?

If in fact a program called wpa_supplicant is run
in order to establish WiFi security
even if WPA is not being used,
wpa_supplicant can also setup WEP encryption, static or based on RADIUS
authentication. AFAIK NetworkManager uses wpa_supplicant as the only
backend to WiFi security. It surely has its advantages, because this way
you have only to deal with *one* helper problem.

I don't know if NM needs wpa_supplicant on unencrypted connections.

Besides, NM is OK if you have rather simple network environment, e.g. only
one WLAN card and one LAN card, you use only static WPA or WEP keys, you
have a DHCP server, and so on, and so on...

Each time the setup is more complex (no LAN DHCP, two WLAN cards or WPA +
PEAP/MSCHAPv2) my experience tells me that it simply can't do it. (V0.6.7
on Ubuntu.) The non-existent documentation does not help either.

That NM is ancient, Fedora-8's and 9's are much more flexible, they support multiple devices. including mobile broadband devices, many more security options.

Documentation? NM has been around since FC6, and people seem to keep saying that the documentation is being worked on. At least on FC9beta it really didn't work, ignored the hardwire, and brought the WiFi up on a random open AP. I live between an apartment building and a college, there are enough open APs available to choose.

--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
  "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked."  - from Slashdot

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux