Re: High availability on two boxes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Uno Engborg wrote, On 05/07/2008 03:33 AM:
The problem is that it can't be expanded to more than 2 boxes in the future.


what do you mean by more than 2 boxes[1], and how far in the future?

http://www.linbit.com/en/products-services/drbd/drbd-plus/
I believe they will probably roll this functionality into the openly released version later, but even so they have described on the mailing list that it's setup is very difficult, i.e., you'll want to pay them to set it up.

[1] with the current setup you can have several nodes in one drbd cluster, but _each_ drbd _resource_ is only mirrored between two nodes.



Thanks!
/uno


2008/5/5, Gijs <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
You might want to take a look at http://www.drbd.org/.
It basically does what you suggest. It creates a software raid 1 partition
across a local and networked partition.
Perfect for real-time syncronisation between disks across a network, while
not having to resort to expensive stuff like SANs and the like.

Regards,

Gijs

Uno Engborg wrote:

Hi,
I'm experimenting with a HA setup on two physical boxes.  The idea is to
create virtual Xen machines that  automagically do live migration from one
physical box to the other in case of e.g. a hardware failure on one of the
physial boxes.

My idea is to create a software raid of networked block devices and real
disks.  I.e:

Box A:
Software raid consisting of:
Physical disk in box A
Nework block device exported from box B

Box B:
Software raid consisting of:
Physical disk in box B
Network block device exported from box A


On top of this I plan t use  GFS2 and a cluster that handles the
migration of the virtual machines.

Any comments on this, would this work, or would it result in deadlock?
What about quorum disk? I suppose
I need one? Most setup of these kind of things usually have their
storage on a separate
SAN, but as this is mostly for experimentation and testing purposes, I
would hope that I could do without that for now.

What would be the best way to export the network block devices? I'm
thinking iSCSI or GNDB?

If this doesn't  look like a good idea, are there any other way to do
this.

Regards
Uno Engborg


--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list




--
Todd Denniston
Crane Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC Crane)
Harnessing the Power of Technology for the Warfighter

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux