On Mon, 05 May 2008 19:06:02 -0400 Sam Varshavchik <mrsam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Steven P. Ulrick writes: > >> > Installing: kernel > >> > ######################### [1/3] nash received SIGSEGV! Backtrace > >> > (11): /sbin/nash[0x805314a] > >> > [0x110440] > >> > /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0[0x314ce13] > >> > /usr/lib/libbdevid.so.6.0.19(bdevid_module_unload_all+0x31)[0x8c3e37] > >> > /usr/lib/libbdevid.so.6.0.19(bdevid_destroy+0x2d)[0x8c357c] > >> > /usr/lib/libnash.so.6.0.19[0x967174] > >> > /usr/lib/libnash.so.6.0.19(nash_vitals_destroy_probes+0x3f)[0x9677ec] > >> > /usr/lib/libnash.so.6.0.19(_nashFreeContext+0x1c)[0x957fc6] > >> > /sbin/nash[0x80536e4] > >> > /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe0)[0xafe390] > >> > /sbin/nash[0x804ae61] > >> > /sbin/nash[0x804ae61] > >> > error: %post(kernel-2.6.24.5-85.fc8.i686) scriptlet failed, > >> > signal 2 > >> > >> Run memtest86, and check for bad RAM. > > > > Hello Sam > > I ran memtest86 for about 45 minutes and there were no errors. I'll > > try running it again this evening for a much longer period of time. > > If memtest comes up clean, you probably have some core system > libraries corrupted in some way. Try running rpm -V glibc > glibc-common nash Hello Sam, I re-ran Memtest86 for 3 hours and 26 minutes and it reported no errors. So I ran "rpm -V glibc glibc-common nash" and the results were as follows: [root@afolkey2 ~]# rpm -V glibc glibc-common nash [root@afolkey2 ~]# -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
