Craig White wrote: > No - you misunderstood him > > It is not possible to have a 'DN: Address Book' No, it is you who misunderstand. I was _asked_ for the DN, and the only response that worked was "Address Book". Bizarrely, I just checked, and now any response works - presumably the DN (or RDN) has been stored somewhere. > All you need is suitable 'ou' with ACL permissions to access that 'ou' > and if that 'ou' were called 'People_I_Want_to_SPAM', Kaddressbook would > be happy with that too. Of course, that gets into the nuts and bolts of > LDAP. Having an 'ou' called 'Address Book' or 'AddressBook' has no > meaning to Kaddressbook unless Kaddressbook is configured to use the DN > like... > ou=AddressBook,dc=xyz,dc=com KAddressBook had already asked for my host. The only sense I can make of it is that KAddressBook constructed the DN from this, together with "Address Book", which I gave in response to "DN". Incidentally, the reason I did this was that I was following the yolinux tutorial at <http://www.yolinux.com/TUTORIALS/LinuxTutorialLDAP.html>. You are invited to access their LDAP server, and I found that I could indeed see their address book in my KAddressBook when I gave Host: ldap.yo-linux.com , DN: o=stooges . This was following their general instructions, which read (in part): * Name: YoLinux Demo * Hostname: ldap.yo-linux.com * Base DN: o=stooges -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
