max bianco: >>> What besides zero conf will do it? Tim: >> In Fedora's case, it's usually called Avahi. Ric Moore: > huh, I had thought ZeroConf died and blew away way back in the Caldera > days. It was a good idea, but was cussed widely at the time. Ric I would have thought that Caldera lived and died before the name "ZeroConf" got applied to link-local addresses, but I can't be sure. There are benefits in being able to create ad-hoc networks, that sort themselves out completely (e.g. home LANs, without any servers). And there are benefits to not having that system, at all. It's certainly better, the Linux way, that it's a separate service that you can manage how you like. As opposed to how I saw it operating on Windows, where if you weren't configured with a static address, or a DHCP server didn't give you an address, the machine gave itself an address without any option to avoid it. People plugged in, got some address, and thought networking should work, and couldn't work out why it didn't (they'd be on a different subnet than the rest). Whereas if they got an error message about not having an address, they'd have immediately started fault-finding in the right place. -- (This computer runs FC7, my others run FC4, FC5 & FC6, in case that's important to the thread.) Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
