Paul Shaffer:
>>> Just to clarify, I don't disagree with Fedora's approach to the
>>> licensing and software patent issues at all. In fact, I think it's
>>> quite admirable. Just maybe not the best way to build user base for a
>>> distro that is ostensibly for "lazy" users.
Tim:
>> Since when was *this* distribution aimed at them? Fedora's touted as
>> bleeding edge, for those that want that sort of thing. Ubuntu's the one
>> targeted at the lazy user - the Windows user who's sick of Windows, but
>> doesn't realise they'd like to use a Mac. ;-)
Paul Shaffer:
> was referring to users in general. - anyone who might be inclined to use
> Linux on the desktop, as opposed to admins and engineers who might be
> higher level users employing a Linux desktop.
>
> Evidently you didn't read the whole thread. The poster before me made
> the lazy user comment..
I most certainly have. Evidently you can't write in a coherent manner.
You clearly mentioned Fedora's approach, then went straight into saying
it's maybe not the best way to build a user base... No mention of
Ubuntu in there, at all.
We're not mind readers, we can't tell what you meant to say, on read
what you actually did.
--
Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.
I read messages from the public lists.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
