On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 12:50 -0400, Mauriat M wrote: > 2008/4/25 Todd Zullinger <tmz@xxxxxxxxx>: > > Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 11:59 -0400, Mauriat M wrote: > > > > >> Try this: > > >> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-February/msg01960.html > > > > > > Well, as far as I can tell that thread pretty much just confirms > > > what I said, i.e. msttcorefonts requires chkfontpath, and it's not > > > in the F9 repos. It appears to be a bug. > > > > The message that Mauriat pointed to contains a spec file with the > > chkfontpath requirement removed. Does that not work? (I've not tried > > it myself, since I don't want or need the MS fonts. But I don't see > > any mention of chkfontpath in the spec there.) > > Although I created it in F8, the generated RPM worked correctly for me > in F9-Preview. I tried it using the spec file in the thread. I was confused because the comment at the top says: # This is the msttcorefonts spec file as distributed from # http://corefonts.sourceforge.net/. but in fact it isn't. Everything works now, thanks. poc -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
