On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 22:10 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 21:54 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >> Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > >> > >>> Trying it is not really an answer, as it will be informative if it > >>> doesn't work on some doc (testing can show the presence of bugs, not > >>> their absence, etc. etc.). If the point is to have the same metrics, the > >>> publicity should say so explicitly. > >> Sure it does. > >> > >> http://www.press.redhat.com/2007/05/09/liberation-fonts/ > >> > >> "Red Hat contracted with Ascender Corp., one of the leading commercial > >> developers of fonts, to develop a set of fonts that are metrically > >> equivalent to the key Microsoft fonts." > > > > Well, I didn't scour the Web looking for references to Liberation fonts. > > I read the page you sent (https://www.redhat.com/promo/fonts/) where it > > says nothing about metrics. Who reads press releases? > > You were referring to "publicity". Press releases are a good example of > that and says what you wanted explicitly. Problem solved. I doubt you mean to say that a page with the URL <.../promo/...> isn't publicity. That's the page you sent, presumably because it's the natural focus for info on the topic and looks very much like an announcement. I note that it doesn't even refer to the Press Release ... 'Nuff said. Cheers poc -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
