On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 21:04 +0930, Tim wrote: > On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 13:08 +0200, Luc MAIGNAN wrote: > > I'm not sure it's the right place for a such question, but I need > > experts feedback. > > It's not... You've replied to another thread, and buried your > completely different topic in the middle of it. People ignoring this > thread will not see your message. People who get annoyed by thread > hijacking will deliberately not reply to your query. Your message was > not a reply to the prior post, do not use the reply feature in a mail > client for the wrong purpose. > > Try again, this time *create* *a* *new* message. And I mean that > precisely - use the function in your mail client to "create a new > message", do not reply to some other message then modify things. > > You probably will get someone replying about spam assassin, or more or > better replies, that way. Agreed, this really pisses me off. However some people don't realize they're doing it because in certain Redmond-based mail clients a new subject counts as starting a new thread (thread sorting is based on subject rather than -- or in preference to -- the standard Reply-To header). I notice the OP is using one of the aforementioned clients. poc -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
