Re: grub vs. me

["Mikkel L. Ellertson" <mikkel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> What is more
> interesting is that your edited version has root on /dev/sda3. Is this
> consistent with the partition you have marked as bootable (see fdisk)?
>
> poc
It does not need to be marked bootable. It does need to be the 
correct partition for the root partition. For that matter, the root 
partition does not need to be a primary partition. Depending on your 
BIOS, you may need one partition marked as bootable, but this is not 
requirement for Grub or booting Linux.

I have one system here with the /boot partition marked as bootable, 
andther where the Windows partition is marked as bootable, and an 
old RH7.3 system without a partition marked as bootable. All work fine.

Mikkel
--

  Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons,
for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list