Re: Linux is KING - Couldn't be hacked - Mac, Vista went down in flames

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 30 Mar 2008, Chris wrote:

Manuel Aróstegui wrote:
El sáb, 29-03-2008 a las 12:24 -0400, Jim escribió:
Read article

That's cool, but it's far to be the real scenario we face everyday.
I guess that Linux box was secure but the truth here, as far as I've
been able to see is that either Windows or Linux (I have no mac
experience) are both pretty insecure if they're been running by a dumb
administrator.
It is clear that a Linux, out of the box, has less chances to be hacked
than a windows in the same situation.

But for me, this hacking contest does not represent a real scenario.

Anyways, I'm glad Linux survived, do not take me wrong :-)
Manuel

Let's also not forget the most important part of the article - it mentioned something about Java allowing MS security to be circumvented.

That leads me to think that if Java was not installed on that box, would it have been hacked?

If you don't want to install Java you need to tell us what alternative is going to provide better security. Many developers use Java because the work needed to implement the functionality (including the attention to security issues) would be prohibitive.

MS was chosen for this attack because the person who knew the Java
exploit also happened to be familiar with MS.  Such attacks often
proceed in stages:

1. get user-level access via a browser, java, etc.
2. elevate to "admin/root" privileges, which is where knowledge of
the specific OS comes in.

Often the 1st step works on multiple platforms.

Perhaps not. So, I think the article is very misleading. To me, I could care either way. as pointed out else where in this thread, a properly patched and managed box (under any OS) can be very difficult to hack.

Or not, if you happen to know of an unpatched vulnerability.

I wonder why (at least in this article) OpenBSD was not mentioned. Perhaps it was just a session that was betwix Linux & MS.

OS X was the first to fall (via safari), so the BSD camp didn't fare very well.

--
George N. White III  <aa056@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
[Index of Archives]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora Magazine]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Summer Coding]     [Fedora Laptop]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [SSH]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux