Tim: >> I discourage anybody from implementing bad technology that causes >> denial of service issues. Craig White: > of course you do... As any sensible person would do. Which other denial of (your own) services would you advocate allowing to happen, as well? > You would rather have clients employing all sorts of local junk mail > filters because of your tunnel vision. Since you apparently can't > master technology, why would you expect that your clients are able? You're making assumptions. One, that clients should employ local junk mail filtering, as the only possible alternative to greylisting. The old "there's only two types of music, country or western" argument. And that for some strange reason, it's magically my fault that I cannot make greylisting work properly on someone else's mail server. You keep ignoring the issue, that greylisting is a problem because of other people's servers, more than your own. We (the general public) send through their ISP's server, and it's received by someone else's SMTP. > Alternative theory here...you suffer from an over inflated value of > your own opinions...nothing new there. Pot, kettle, black. You're the one promulgating an "opinion" (that greylisting is brilliant), I'm the one bringing up a "fact" that it causes problems. -- (This computer runs FC7, my others run FC4, FC5 & FC6, in case that's important to the thread.) Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
