Albert Graham wrote:
I'm sorry that you don't understand my response,
Did you expect anyone to understand that your installations weren't typical?
but I did actually take
the time to visit the reference website you posted that "slated" the
Fedora a distribution, It was clear to me that, that guy does not have a
clue and is getting what he deserves, surely you understand that you
should not be taking his advice - that would be a case of the blind
leading the blind.
I didn't make the initial post with the reference. My comment was that
his seemed like a typical experience.
The only real issue is a stable kernel for your requirements,
everything else is less important, also I have a habit of running
everything in user-space so it's a lot easier to virtualize or switch
out the underlying OS if required.
How do you virtualize "everything"? You have to have a real kernel
and device drivers somewhere. If that isn't an up-to-date fedora then
you are talking about something very different than it seems here.
And I'd still like to understand this part. Do you only recommend
fedora for people who can virtualize it?
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
