Antonio M wrote:
2008/3/10, pursley1@xxxxxxxxxxxx <pursley1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
I'm sad to say that I also experienced the same problem but not on both
my computers that use Fedora. One did and the other didn't and I had to
re-configure eth0 manually before it would come back up. Sounds like
something's wrong with the update.
Bradley
Antonio M wrote:
> 2008/3/10, John Austin <ja@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>
>> On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 12:22 +0100, Antonio M wrote:
>> > I have a router with two NIC's.
>> > After this morning updates, definition of network interfaces was
>> > garbled, I found etho.bak and eth1.bak in addition to eth0 and
>> > eth1....but eth0 and eth1 were not activated at boot time, as they
>> > were defined as getting address from a DHCP server.
>> > therefore no internet connection and no DHCP.
>> > I had to reconfigure eth0 and eth1 by hand, delete *.bak files and
>> > restart system
>> >
>> > Anybody else with same problem???
>> >
>> > --
>> > Antonio Montagnani
>> > Skype : antoniomontag
>> >
>>
>>
>> Hi Antonio
>>
>> Yep - I have had the same problem
>>
>> Also I'm not happy with the latest kernel and am
>> staying with 2.6.23.15-137 for now.
>>
>> John
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> fedora-list mailing list
>> fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
>> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>>
>>
> John
>
> 1) do you have a single NIC system or two NIC'S system?
> 2) what is the problem with latest kernel??
>
>
>
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
against which component shall we file a bug???
Unfortunately -
1) We don't know which updated component is messing up the network
connection.
2) I'm relatively new to Fedora (but not Linux) and so I don't know
where to file bugs anyway.
3) Since it only did it on 1 of my 2 computers, it seems to be some
problem dependent on the hardware...or luck.
Bradley
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
