On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 01:08:52PM -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote: > R. G. Newbury wrote: > > You are apparently right about dev not being enabled by default. It > > is not on this laptop and most assuredly not changed from the > > default on the desktop machine which got screwed. > > That's good. The question then is "where are you getting kde4 > packages that replace kde3 on anything other than rawhide?" > > I think you should post the output of "yum repolist" so we can see > what repos you have enabled. > > > As to 'pretty stupid admin practice', well gee, (said he, chuckling > > too) it was faac or faad or lame or some such which I was trying to > > install so that the configure for mplayer would not barf. Those are > > atrpm rpms, so "please forgive me" for not expecting that I would > > get a whole new desktop too....for free!!! while I was looking > > elsewhere. > > Okay, adding atrpms to the mix can surely complicate your life a bit. > If you enable atrpms you can end up pulling in more than you want. Please don't simply discourage people from using a repo w/o checking whether this issue has anything to do with their problem. There is nothing from kde4 in ATrpms, I think the OP was angered about wanting to update/install something completely irrelevant to kde and he got a kde4 upgrade w/o him noticing due to using yum -y. But that's just the way yum update works. > I'd recommend disabling it by default and then selectively enabling it > at the command line when you want to install a specific package from > there. No, please don't. If you do that, then better don't use the repo at all. This practice leads to phantom bugs that people then consider being caused by ATrpms which is not correct. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpD1wTTeb0jV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
