David Boles wrote:
Nathan Grennan wrote:
Brian wrote:
I strongly advise against using Konqueror. Use Firefox 3. Here are
some benchmarks I ran just yesterday.
I would have to advise against Firefox 3.0b3 or later. See the bug
below.
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=421482
You are going to have explain the logic for this one for me to understand.
"Excessive fsync during a kernel compile causes Firefox 3 become
completely unresponsive till the fsyncs are complete. In some cases if
something else i/o intensive is going on Firefox 3 will freeze till the
other i/o has completely finished. If it gets really really bad other
applications start freezing."
You were doing something as intensive as compiling a kernel and Firefox
became "unresponsive" and that is Firefox's fault?
FF2 and FF3 beta 2 don't have a problem, FF3 beta 3 does have a problem.
Where would *you* say the regression lies? And since when is a kernel
compile "intensive?" Unless run with non-standard make options, it's not
intensive at all, particularly disk intensive. I just did a build on an
older K7 (Athlon) with 1GB RAM and some six year old slow IDE drives
running ata-66 connections. FF2, Konquerer and seamonkey all fine,
recent FF3 glacial.
I think there's a serious evil in FF3, other have suggested the latest
release does an order of magnitude more fsync() calls than beta 2.
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
