On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Timothy Murphy <gayleard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Izhar Firdaus wrote: > > >> > I sincerely hope that applications that don't work well > >> > do _not_ get into Fedora repositories. > >> > >> Perhaps when such applications land in a test repo, they get improved > >> upon? > >> > >> .... You'd hope so. > > > > Apps gets better when they have more users and more tests ... Ain't > > that Fedora is all about -> pushing these not-yet-good-enough apps to > > the masses, so that it issues can be identified, and the apps > > development get driven forward. > > No. > At least not as far as I am concerned - > and I imagine 95% of Fedora users. > I want a system that works, > or at least that is expected to work. What do you imagine the other 5% want? > I don't mind what is put in fedora-development.repo > as I only look there for specific applications. > But I expect packages in fedora-updates to be well-tested, > and that is in fact what I have always found. "Well-tested" and "working well" are two different creatures. On my hardware wicd outperforms NetworkManager - no question. I'm pretty sure that my case is ultimately a hardware issue, but in *any* case it would be nice to have an alternate wifi manager that works (better) when NM refuses to work (well). 2 cents, Chris -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
