On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 14:19 +1000, Da Rock wrote: > On Sun, 2008-02-24 at 23:01 -0500, Todd Zullinger wrote: > > Da Rock wrote: > > > Ok, I know a little of this has been covered before, but I have some new > > > info after some exhaustive debugging. > > > > > > After the feedback regarding the repo conflicts, I decided to resolve > > > this once and for all. I uninstalled all mplayer, x264 and xine > > > packages, and reinstalled only the livna versions. > > > > > > This produced mixed results. Firstly, Yum reported the packages > > > installed. When you go back and check what is installed (version, etc) > > > it stated that the freshrpms versions were installed- but only some. So > > > I ended up with some livna and some freshrpms, despite the fact that I > > > selected only livna packages to be installed. > > > > You may want to disable or remove the freshrpms and livna repo files > > in /etc/yum.repos.d and then use yum list extras to find what packages > > are still installed from either of those repositories. Something > > like: > > > > yum --disablerepo livna --disablerepo freshrpms list extras > > > > might help you locate the packages that are still installed from > > either livna or freshrpms. > > > > Once you clean everything up and only have one of those repositories > > enabled, you should find that things work a bit smoother. There are > > sometimes still occasional hiccups, especially with packages that > > extend things that are in Fedora, but nothing more than you see > > occasionally even within the stock repos. > > > > > So I put it to all- what the hell is going on here? Neither repo > > > appears to be able to declare what the packages ACTUALLY provide, > > > and Yum is getting very confused. So who's fault is it? Where does > > > the responsibility lie? > > > > The responsibility lies with each user/admin. If you enable third > > party repositories that conflict with each other, you are responsible > > for cleaning it up. It's a mess, for sure. That's why it's not > > recommended or supported. > > I think you miss my point a little. This is a bug- but who do I report > it to? Yum developers or the repos? Seeing as Yum is misreporting the > packages it would seem that Yum is a problem and needs to be extended to > resolve these issues. > > Sure, as sysadmin I can get in and mess around fixing these problems > manually, but if this is being misreported, then how well do you think > updates are going to completed? Not to mention other less experienced > users... > Let me put it this way- libx264.so.56 is found at /usr/lib on my system. So why doesn't Yum see that this library is installed? And why does it see libx264.so.56 in the freshrpms package when it clearly isn't? -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
