Bill Davidsen wrote:
Terry Polzin wrote:
On Wednesday 20 February 2008 14:32, Bill Davidsen wrote:
I am trying to replace a bunch of NFS servers with new machines running
FC8. The NFS server is doing some kind of evil security check which was
not present in FC1, causing connection rejects like "invalid port
XXXXXX" messages. Since the port works against the FC1 server, and there
are 120-140 clients per server, running various operating systems, the
solution lies in telling the NFS service to stop doing the unwanted
security check and treat anything coming through iptables as valid.
Has someone a thought on this? Changing clients isn't going to happen,
and it seems the Solaris NFS server works (or the upgrade from FC1 might
be dropped).
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot
Can we see your /etc/exports file? You may need to add insecure to
your exports to use some ports in newer NFS instances.
I'm not that far along, I have just been exporting with exportfs at the
moment, and I have turned secure mounts off. If that gets all clients
working I'll change to using insecure.
Newer instances is right, I'm building a FC9alpha1 test box as I type,
I'll test both client and server on FC[6789] and client on everything.
More later, thanks.
After having fought with NFS for a weekend I found that you have to
define the ports in the NFS configuration files and then open them up in
the firewall.
/etc/sysconfig/nfs
The ports are random now.
At home I have now moved to sshfs instead of nfs, more secure and easier
to setup.
--
Robin Laing
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
