On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 16:16 -0600, Thomas Cameron wrote: > Please check it out now? > > http://www.camerontech.com/fedora-list-stats/ > > I will reiterate that security through obscurity is silly, but here > you go. :-) Well, it's not really about "security", so the statement doesn't really fit. It's privacy, and obscurity and privacy go hand in hand, in the normal run of things - don't tell, and it remains private. Personally, I wouldn't even put <at> or <dot> or <com> clues into the list, as well. That's easy to automatically unmunge, and we (us humans) can spot our own addresses easily enough without them. I'd not even space the parts apart, that still allows for simple guessing games with unmunging about where to put parts of the address together (spammers trying all the obvious permutations, regardless). e.g. just "ignoredmailboxyahoo" would be enough to identify posting stats, without giving any easy pickings to spammers. -- (This computer runs FC7, my others run FC4, FC5 & FC6, in case that's important to the thread.) Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
