-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Terry - Fedora Core wrote:
> Richard England wrote:
>> Terry - Fedora Core wrote:
>>> As I reported on another thread, SELinux has caused me trouble and
>>> blocked access to my hard disks.
>>>
>>> To solve the problem, I set SELinux to "permissive" mode. Am I
>>> positive that SELinux caused the problem of not being able access the
>>> hard disks. No. But then when I set SELinux to permissive mode the
>>> problem disappeared. Not proof, but very strong evidence.
>>>
>>> My question:
>>>
>>> Should I enable SELinux again?
>>>
>>> What do I gain if I do?
>>>
>>> Will the gain be greater than the loss of accessing my computer hard
>>> disks?
>>>
>>> And if I do, how do I try to prevent it from locking me out of the
>>> hard disks again?
>>>
>>> How do I determine what caused SELinux to block access, how much
>>> trouble is it to change SELinux to prevent it from doing that again?
>>>
>>> Your insights are appreciated.
>>>
>>> Terry
>>>
>> You need to provide more solid details around "...blocked access to my
>> hard disks." What error messages are you seeing? Some one on this
>> list might
> The error messages were along the lines that an application could not
> write to it's resource file in it's hidden directory in my home directory.
>
> Also, Konqueror simply refused to open any directories whatsoever. It
> displayed the directory structure in the navigation panel, but it would
> not allow access to any directory, even directories under my home
> directory. Nor would it allow access to other hard disks on the system -
> hard disks other than the hard disk that FEdora Core 8 is installed on.
> The computer was still working, but ALL directories and ALL files were
> simply not accesable, either by Konqueror or any other application. Even
> when I used File Manager (Konqueror) in super user mode or the super
> user terminal. I simply got error messages that I did not have
> sufficient permission to access the directory/file - even the super user
> (root) got the same message. I attributed t6his to SELinux based on the
> simple logic that SELinux was giving me the error messages relating to
> blocking access to something or other. See SELinux error reports below.
>> be able to assist you. Is SELinux involved? Probably, given your
>> experience but how is yet to be determine. It might be as simple as
>> a need to relabel your file system ("touch /.autorelabel" and reboot.
>> ), but provide more detail and someone can help tell you if that is
>> your problem
>>
>> I've been running F7 and F8 with SElinux enabled for as long as they
>> have both been out and have had not difficulties. So it is possible.
> I copied the SELinux Troubleshooter reports on another thread, but they
> don't seem to have made it to the list so I'll copy them below. They
> make no sense to me. It references something about labeling problems,
> but I did not label anything. I would expect the installation program to
> apply appropriate labels to everything that the user would need to do to
> download and install and configure the system for normal use so that
> SELinux would not need to complain about such things. (Note the octal
> IDs below have been randomly changed by me - I get nervous when I see
> such information being made public :-) )
>
> Terry
>
> SELinux Trouble Reports follow - 4 (converted to text from pdf by
> pdftotext)
>
>
> Summary SELinux is preventing gdm (xdm_t) "execute" to <Unknown>
> (rpm_exec_t). Detailed Description SELinux denied access requested by
> gdm. It is not expected that this access is required by gdm and this
> access may signal an intrusion attempt. It is also possible that the
> specific version or configuration of the application is causing it to
> require additional access. Allowing Access Sometimes labeling problems
> can cause SELinux denials. You could try to restore the default system
> file context for <Unknown>, restorecon -v <Unknown> If this does not
> work, there is currently no automatic way to allow this access. Instead,
> you can generate a local policy module to allow this access - see
> http://fedora.redhat.com/docs/selinux-faq-fc5/#id2961385 Or you can
> disable SELinux protection altogether. Disabling SELinux protection is
> not recommended. Please file a
> http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi against this package.
> Additional Information Source Context Target Context Target Objects
> Affected RPM Packages Policy RPM Selinux Enabled Policy Type MLS Enabled
> Enforcing Mode Plugin Name Host Name Platform Alert Count First Seen
> Last Seen Local ID Line Numbers Raw Audit Messages avc: denied { execute
> } for comm=gdm dev=sda7 name=rpm pid=3107
> scontext=system_u:system_r:xdm_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 tclass=file
> tcontext=system_u:object_r:rpm_exec_t:s0
> system_u:system_r:xdm_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 system_u:object_r:rpm_exec_t:s0
> None [ file ] selinux-policy-3.0.8-44.fc8 True targeted True Enforcing
> plugins.catchall_file Home-Net Linux Home-Net 2.6.23.1-42.fc8 #1 SMP Tue
> Oct 30 13:55:12 EDT 2007 i686 i686 7 Wed 06 Feb 2008 01:50:35 PM EST Thu
> 07 Feb 2008 10:26:00 AM EST 41e3c4c1-b5da-4c6a-8917-01b4013c448f
>
> Summary SELinux is preventing gdm (xdm_t) "getattr" to /bin/rpm
> (rpm_exec_t). Detailed Description SELinux denied access requested by
> gdm. It is not expected that this access is required by gdm and this
> access may signal an intrusion attempt. It is also possible that the
> specific version or configuration of the application is causing it to
> require additional access. Allowing Access Sometimes labeling problems
> can cause SELinux denials. You could try to restore the default system
> file context for /bin/rpm, restorecon -v /bin/rpm If this does not work,
> there is currently no automatic way to allow this access. Instead, you
> can generate a local policy module to allow this access - see
> http://fedora.redhat.com/docs/selinux-faq-fc5/#id2961385 Or you can
> disable SELinux protection altogether. Disabling SELinux protection is
> not recommended. Please file a
> http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi against this package.
> Additional Information Source Context Target Context Target Objects
> Affected RPM Packages Policy RPM Selinux Enabled Policy Type MLS Enabled
> Enforcing Mode Plugin Name Host Name Platform Alert Count First Seen
> Last Seen Local ID Line Numbers Raw Audit Messages avc: denied { getattr
> } for comm=gdm dev=sda7 egid=0 euid=0 exe=/bin/bash exit=-13 fsgid=0
> fsuid=0 gid=0 items=0 path=/bin/rpm pid=3107
> scontext=system_u:system_r:xdm_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 sgid=0
> subj=system_u:system_r:xdm_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 suid=0 tclass=file
> tcontext=system_u:object_r:rpm_exec_t:s0 tty=(none) uid=0
> system_u:system_r:xdm_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 system_u:object_r:rpm_exec_t:s0
> /bin/rpm [ file ] rpm-4.4.2.2-3.fc8 [target] selinux-policy-3.0.8-44.fc8
> True targeted True Enforcing plugins.catchall_file Home-Net Linux
> Home-Net 2.6.23.1-42.fc8 #1 SMP Tue Oct 30 13:55:12 EDT 2007 i686 i686
> 13 Wed 06 Feb 2008 01:50:35 PM EST Thu 07 Feb 2008 10:26:00 AM EST
> 845ddb2e-69a4-6f67-5508-83456c0bff19
>
> Summary SELinux is preventing sh (loadkeys_t) "search" to <Unknown>
> (home_root_t). Detailed Description SELinux denied access requested by
> sh. It is not expected that this access is required by sh and this
> access may signal an intrusion attempt. It is also possible that the
> specific version or configuration of the application is causing it to
> require additional access. Allowing Access Sometimes labeling problems
> can cause SELinux denials. You could try to restore the default system
> file context for <Unknown>, restorecon -v <Unknown> If this does not
> work, there is currently no automatic way to allow this access. Instead,
> you can generate a local policy module to allow this access - see
> http://fedora.redhat.com/docs/selinux-faq-fc5/#id2961385 Or you can
> disable SELinux protection altogether. Disabling SELinux protection is
> not recommended. Please file a
> http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi against this package.
> Additional Information Source Context Target Context Target Objects
> Affected RPM Packages Policy RPM Selinux Enabled Policy Type MLS Enabled
> Enforcing Mode Plugin Name Host Name Platform Alert Count First Seen
> Last Seen Local ID Line Numbers Raw Audit Messages avc: denied { search
> } for comm=sh dev=sda7 egid=0 euid=0 exe=/bin/bash exit=-13 fsgid=0
> fsuid=0 gid=0 items=0 name=home pid=4986
> scontext=system_u:system_r:loadkeys_t:s0 sgid=0
> subj=system_u:system_r:loadkeys_t:s0 suid=0 tclass=dir
> tcontext=system_u:object_r:home_root_t:s0 tty=(none) uid=0
> system_u:system_r:loadkeys_t:s0 system_u:object_r:home_root_t:s0 None [
> dir ] selinux-policy-3.0.8-44.fc8 True targeted True Enforcing
> plugins.catchall_file Home-Net Linux Home-Net 2.6.23.1-42.fc8 #1 SMP Tue
> Oct 30 13:55:12 EDT 2007 i686 i686 2 Wed 06 Feb 2008 04:52:48 PM EST Wed
> 06 Feb 2008 04:52:48 PM EST 54a23c38-b925-4467-aa0e-5d3fdcc5d799
>
> Summary SELinux is preventing sh (loadkeys_t) "search" to <Unknown>
> (unconfined_home_dir_t). Detailed Description SELinux denied access
> requested by sh. It is not expected that this access is required by sh
> and this access may signal an intrusion attempt. It is also possible
> that the specific version or configuration of the application is causing
> it to require additional access. Allowing Access Sometimes labeling
> problems can cause SELinux denials. You could try to restore the default
> system file context for <Unknown>, restorecon -v <Unknown> If this does
> not work, there is currently no automatic way to allow this access.
> Instead, you can generate a local policy module to allow this access -
> see http://fedora.redhat.com/docs/selinux-faq-fc5/#id2961385 Or you can
> disable SELinux protection altogether. Disabling SELinux protection is
> not recommended. Please file a
> http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi against this package.
> Additional Information Source Context Target Context Target Objects
> Affected RPM Packages Policy RPM Selinux Enabled Policy Type MLS Enabled
> Enforcing Mode Plugin Name Host Name Platform Alert Count First Seen
> Last Seen Local ID Line Numbers Raw Audit Messages avc: denied { search
> } for comm=sh dev=sda7 name=terry pid=4986
> scontext=system_u:system_r:loadkeys_t:s0 tclass=dir
> tcontext=unconfined_u:object_r:unconfined_home_dir_t:s0
> system_u:system_r:loadkeys_t:s0
> unconfined_u:object_r:unconfined_home_dir_t:s0 None [ dir ]
> selinux-policy-3.0.8-44.fc8 True targeted True Enforcing
> plugins.catchall_file Home-Net Linux Home-Net 2.6.23.1-42.fc8 #1 SMP Tue
> Oct 30 13:55:12 EDT 2007 i686 i686 22 Wed 06 Feb 2008 04:52:48 PM EST
> Wed 06 Feb 2008 04:52:48 PM EST 04bec695-038f-408d-bf7a-fa3c5f6e2812
>
>>
>> ~~R
>>
>
This looks like you are logging into the system as xdm_t? If you have a
terminal shell up, execute id -Z to show what context you are logged in as.
I think your system is badly mislabeled. You can execute
touch /.autorelabel; reboot
To fix the system labeling, you should also update to the latest selinux
policy. The installation should have set the labeling in the first
place. I have no idea how you got to this state.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkexr1YACgkQrlYvE4MpobPlWQCZASRumpCarxQKq40pD0k6OGDS
pqMAn3pDKMcefX0dZSWj+06V1W7fUmoF
=il+v
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
