Aaron Konstam wrote: >> And, for what's probably the zillionth time on this list, it is >> never desirable to install or build source rpms as root. Instead, >> install and build as a normal user. You can use the handy >> rpmdev-setuptree script from the rpmdevtools package to create the >> directory structure and config file needed for this. See the draft >> building packages guide for more info: >> >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs/Drafts/BuildingPackagesGuide > > 1.Just to be sure, why is this superior to building the rpm as root? > Is it because the compiling this way cannot destroy your system? Yes. If you build packages as root it is incredibly easy to hose your system. All it takes is a minor error in the rpm spec file or the Makefiles of the software you are building. Many spec files include a command to wipe the build root prior to installing (as in rm -rf). I don't think this is still the case, but in the past I believe the build root defaulted to / if it wasn't set elsewhere in the spec file or the rpm config. Imagine %{buildroot} = / and rm -rf %{buildroot}. (Ouch!) So, for many reasons, it's just not good practice to build packages as root. IMO, it would be nice if upstream rpm or the fedora packages made it harder to do this -- at least spewing a warning about it when you did it. > 2. But you still need to install the binary rpm as root don't you? Yes, to install rpms you do generally need to be root. -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Hang in there, retirement is only thirty years away!
Attachment:
pgp0tIZS0KugB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
