On Wed, 30 Jan 2008, Antonio Olivares wrote: > your kidding me? without fail fedora has on previous releases, an updates > directory size of 1 gig within a week, in fact f7 had it within 3 days (we > used to run fedora mirror, yeah I EOL'd that as well 12 months ago :) ) > I know its bleeding edge, but thats still no excuse for incompetant > quality control. Updates are Good Things(TM). It shows that Fedora developers are finding and fixing bugs in an appropriate and timely fashion. Granted, it's better to not have the bug in the first place, but the people who write the software and those who maintain it in Fedora, and those who use it are all just that: People. No one is perfect, and nothing that anyone makes can therefore also be. If fixing things quickly like this is "incompetant [sic] quality control," I don't want to imagine what "proper" QC is... -- Peter Gordon (codergeek42) GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint: DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
