Broadcom 43: FC7 vs FC8

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Broadcom 43: FC7 vs FC8
From: Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED <m_d_berger_1900@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 15:33:19 +0000 (UTC)
Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Pan/0.131 (Ghosts: First Variation)

On my Compaq dual boot laptop with FC7, I never
got my Broadcom 43 wifi to work despite applying
numerous suggestions received on this list. Are
there relevant improvements in FC8, or is it
best to wait for future developments?  

Thanks for your advice.

Mike.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Broadcom 43: FC7 vs FC8
  - From: Jonathan Dieter
- Re: Broadcom 43: FC7 vs FC8
  - From: Rick Bilonick
- Re: Broadcom 43: FC7 vs FC8
  - From: Martin Marques

Prev by Date: Re: Good bye
Next by Date: Re: Good bye
Previous by thread: Good bye
Next by thread: Re: Broadcom 43: FC7 vs FC8
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Older Fedora Users] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Package Announce] [EPEL Announce] [Fedora Magazine] [Fedora News] [Fedora Summer Coding] [Fedora Laptop] [Fedora Cloud] [Fedora Advisory Board] [Fedora Education] [Fedora Security] [Fedora Scitech] [Fedora Robotics] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Infrastructure] [Fedora Websites] [Anaconda Devel] [Fedora Devel Java] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora Fonts] [ATA RAID] [Fedora Marketing] [Fedora Management Tools] [Fedora Mentors] [SSH] [Fedora Package Review] [Fedora R Devel] [Fedora PHP Devel] [Kickstart] [Fedora Music] [Fedora Packaging] [Centos] [Fedora SELinux] [Fedora Legal] [Fedora Kernel] [Fedora OCaml] [Coolkey] [Virtualization Tools] [ET Management Tools] [Yum Users] [Tux] [Yosemite News] [Gnome Users] [KDE Users] [Fedora Art] [Fedora Docs] [Asterisk PBX] [Fedora Sparc] [Fedora Universal Network Connector] [Libvirt Users] [Fedora ARM]

Powered by Linux